My sons online charter school is discussing justice and they are defining justice and fairness, here are my thoughts. I welcome your comments:

Definitions of justice on the Web:
the quality of being just or fair
judgment involved in the determination of rights and the assignment of rewards and punishments

Definitions of fairness on the Web:
conformity with rules or standards; “the judge recognized the fairness of my claim”
ability to make judgments free from discrimination or dishonesty

webster defines fair as:
6 a : marked by impartiality and honesty : free from self-interest, prejudice, or favoritism b (1) : conforming with the established rules :allowed (2) : consonant with merit or importance : due c : open to legitimate pursuit, attack, or ridicule

Main Entry: jus·tice
Pronunciation: \ˈjəs-təs\
Function: noun
Etymology: Middle English, from Anglo-French justise, from Latin justitia, from justus
Date: 12th century
1 a : the maintenance or administration of what is just especially by the impartial adjustment of conflicting claims or the assignment of merited rewards or punishments b : judgec : the administration of law; especially : the establishment or determination of rights according to the rules of law or equity
2 a : the quality of being just, impartial, or fair b (1) : the principle or ideal of just dealing or right action (2) : conformity to this principle or ideal : righteousness c : the quality of conforming to law
3 : conformity to truth, fact, or reason : correctness

The definitions of Justice and fairness are almost the same, however there is an essential difference. Particularly the assignment of merited rewards or punishments.

When a judge has to determine what is a merited reward or punishment, then while that is Justice, it is not always fair.

Justice, in terms used today, is the application of rules or laws. And the resultant punishment or rewards for breaking or upholding said rules and laws.

A judge often must hand out punishment based on what a law says is merited instead of what is actually merited. An example can be found in this story: http://www.theagitator.com/2009/09/28/hoosier-grandmother-arrested-for-purchasing-cold-medication/.

Admittedly, this woman broke the law, and as the attorney general of Indiana states, ignorance of the law is not an excuse. However, I don’t know of anyone who feels that this “Just” application of the law was “fair”

A more current example can be found here: http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2010/02/05/national/main6177041.shtml A 12 year old girl doodled on her desk. Is this wrong absolutely! Is it fair for her to damage the property owned by the school (though if the truth be told she was using an erasable marker (according to the news)? Of course it’s not fair. However is it justice for her to be handcuffed and marched off to jail, subjected to emotional trauma, and then assigned community service as well? No. She should have been punished, certainly should have been made to clean the desk, and probably all the desks in her classrom. She perhaps should have been given detention. However This application of “fairness” was certainly not Justice.

As a result it concerns me when we define justice in terms of fairness. Nor should we define justice in terms of what is right. Justice, alas is applied by fallible man and as a result it can not always be fair, nor is it always right. The “Jim Crow” laws of the pre-60’s come to mind. They were legal and “Just,” however, they were not right nor fair. As a result we need to teach our children to look at not only what is just but what is right.

The IDEA of Justice is absolute fairness, and the IDEA of Fairness is Justice, however when applied to any system of Man, due to the fallible nature of man, these IDEAS can then no longer be fair.

Our justice system is built on the concept that justice is blind, and being blind, justice is always fair. And if the IDEA of justice could be applied without the opinions of man then justice could be fair. However since we can not apply justice without the thoughts and opinions of man entering in, I don’t think we can equate justice and fairness.

  • Share/Bookmark

I have to wonder what God has planned for this child.

I wish there was a way to know.

  • Share/Bookmark

OK, first of all let me say that though I AM ordained into ministry, I’m not a professional preacher, lecturer, theologian, or even philosopher. If my reasons seem shallow tell me, question me, challenge me! I’ll discuss them with you. I won’t allow crassness, foul language, or crudeness on my site, but otherwise anyone is welcome to comment.

Ok, that being said, I’m going to start with a concept that we have been learning at church of late.

The concept:  Man is not bi-partate (of two parts) but tri-partate (of three parts)

The background: This comes directly from the Bible in many locations, but more recently Watchman Nee wrote about this in The Spiritual Man and The Latent Power of the Soul both are very good books. I don’t know that I agree 100% with everything in them, but that’s OK.

One thing that I definitely do agree with is the fact that man is made up of three parts.

First we have the flesh, the body. It’s the way we as persons interact with the world around us. The flesh contains our senses, taste, touch, sight, smell, and hearing. It’s how we interpret the physical world and environment around us. The flesh has physical needs, wants and desires. the flesh can lust, fear, and rage. It can’t put an explanation as to why it lusts after a certain person, or hungers for a certain thing, the lust is animal in it’s very nature, and on an even playing field with most animals.

Second, we have a soul. Now the soul is eternal, it was created to last forever, and it’s where the “who” that is us lives. the soul is the me, the ID, the who I am. The soul listens closely to the flesh, if the flesh says I want food, the soul says how about ice cream, if the body says I’m tired, the soul says sleep. The soul is the brains of the outfit, even if it’s often as much a follower as a leader.

Third, for those who have been born again, saved, delivered from sin, the self and the world, there is the Spirit. The Spirit helps us interact with the spiritual realms as much, or probably even more than the flesh interacts with the physical realms.

It all seems well and good, till we come to realize that the flesh and the spirit hate each other. One is dead to the other. The flesh is death to the spirit, while the spirit is foolish and ridiculous to the flesh. The two simply can’t stand each other. The flesh says I’m hungry, the spirit says we need to pray. The spirit says, Strive for holiness, the flesh says I want to roll in the things of the world.

OK so, we have 3 parts, all different, what is the point?

The point is that depending on which part of YOU you look at the world from you have a very different perspective. It’s similar to what I used to do as a small child. I would cover one eye and focus on an object, then make the object “jump” simply by shutting that eye and opening the other.  My perspective on the object changed from one eye to the other. Our perspective on situations in life change depending on which set of eyes we are using to look at it; Are we looking with physical eyes at the physical world and the situations there, or with soulish eyes, the eyes of analysis and argument at a situation that affects me, myself, and I, or perhaps we are looking with spiritual eyes at how the situation is in fact being used by a loving Father to help shape and mold us into His image?

Not everyone is willing to even recognize that there is a whole other set of eyes beyond the physical and the intellect. They may even go so far as to say that people who believe that there are spiritual eyes do not have intellectual eyes… it’s unfortunate that they who are blind (some by choice, some by chance) to a whole aspect of their life, feel that others who are not are blinding themselves to the aspect that they see as the most important.

Does that sentence make any sense?  Probably not.

I’ll add more to this later… if you want to hear more comment.

  • Share/Bookmark

« Older entries